That law provides that the obligation to pay the subscription is created by a certain date of its registration does not mean that the lack of registration of the receiver exempt from the fee. If the collector charge a person fails to demonstrate that the receiver has, regardless of the notification of the granting or registration number of the receiver may charge him a fee of thirty times the monthly subscription charge and additionally further abonament.zobacz also unpaid subscription TV can be downloaded from salary » therefore, even if really effective to show that the person concerned was not informed of the granting of an individual number to protect the receiver from paying the subscription Mail shows that you have a receiver (if no application for deregistration it will not be difficult to prove). Described in the Internet case a lady who did not pay, unfortunately, it has not been settled in court, which is a pity, because there would be excluded getting interesting precedent. Mail discontinue further windykowania itself, which does not mean that completely abandoned the worst roszczenia.Co to subscription fees and the fees referred to in Article. 5 paragraph. 3, the provisions on administrative enforcement proceedings for the enforcement of financial obligations.
This means that these receivables are collected in administrative execution mode, ie. By the Head of the competent tax office, and usually learn about it after download funds from our account. Then of course we are entitled to so-called initiation. action przeciwegzekucyjnego before the competent administrative court and showing all indications, exempting us from the fee (no receiver, belonging to a group statutorily exempt, the repayment of debts before the initiation of proceedings, signed agreement for repayment limitation, deregistration receiver etc.) but might help solve the errors formal often committed by the Polish Post or claim enforcement Heads of the US, so it is worth checking if there were violated art. 33 and 34 of the Law on enforcement proceedings in administracji.zobacz also: Subscribe to pay everyone homeworkmarket.me? Czabański: Condensation collecting new year »It is better to focus on the real possibilities of reduction of debt as limitation, exemption from fees, the possibility of redemption in certain situations (Article 10 of the Act) or other specific cases identified in the Act or the usual payment in installments or redemption percentage. Moreover, it is worth checking whether enforcing followed the required procedure, in these cases usually no prior warning before the commencement of the execution (eg.
The judgment of the WSA Gliwice SA / Gl 601/15). Nearly 1 thousand. nurseries received a grant last year from the municipal budget. Among them were 510 private care places. This is an increase compared to 2013. When the 793 subsidized institutions accounted for 310 of the local government other than the owner.
Municipalities increasingly recognize the need for funding of private nurseries, because it represents an incentive to create them, and thanks to subsidies lower cost to parents. However, the need to find resources for this purpose in their budgets is the most important obstacle to granting them. No obligatory principle, in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 4 February 2011. Of childcare up to the age (ie Journal of Laws of 2013. Item. 1457, as amended.) Transfer of subsidies for private nurseries in contrast to non-public kindergarten is not mandatory. This self-government in the resolution of the councilors decide whether to admit them and in what amount.
For municipalities that have decided to carry out this task, among others, joined Lublin. – We managed to save budget funds for grants in the amount of 400 zł per month per child. Their introduction lobbied not only the owners of private facilities, but the city authorities have recognized that this may be an incentive to open new nurseries – says Barbara Danieluk, deputy director of the Department of Health and Social Affairs of the City of Lublin. He adds that the grant agreements contained provisions which oblige private companies to reduce fees charged to parents. Responsibilities of municipalities associated with the nursery Act Source: Dziennik Gazeta Prawna In turn, the possibility of obtaining grants Kartuzy facilitate the functioning of the institutions run by the non-governmental organization, which just ended up co-financing from EU funds. Institutions not belonging to the municipality also supports Pszczyna. – We are a nursery, but we recognize that the scale of the needs of parents is much greater.
Hence the decision on the granting of subsidies, and their height was even this year increased from 150 zł to 500 zł per child – says Boguslaw Popiołek manager of the paper in the UM health Pless. He added that the city initially wondered about the introduction of the specific subsidy also because of the provisions of the Act nurseries. Because they require the granting of support for all the children who go to nursery school, even when their parents are not residents of the municipality. The grant may not also be reduced in the event of their absence. Toddler Program Although the number of private institutions of local government funding gradually increasing, it is not commensurate with the increase in how quickly grows non-public nurseries in municipal registers. In 2014. From 1667 until 1182 nurseries were private on-site care.
Taking into account the above-mentioned number of branches of the subsidy and the fact that all municipalities receive it, it turns out that less than half of private nurseries can count on wsparcie.zobacz such as: The number of carers and day nurseries »How to choose a nursery for the baby» What thirteenth child can count on crèche »- not all units see the need for a policy on care wczesnoedukacyjnej, and its element is not only to create their own services in this area, but also to facilitate their development by other entities – says Teresa Ogrodzińska, president of the Foundation for child Development them. Comenius. It adds that subsidize private grooves can be treated as a cheaper alternative to establish municipal facilities. Without the support of local government non-public places care is still applying for funding from the program “Toddler” conducted by the Ministry of Labor. In this framework, they can get a monthly grant to cover the costs of the child’s stay.
To do this, however, they must take part in the competition, which does not give them any guarantee of support. Meanwhile, in public places nurseries it is still thin on the ground. During this year’s exam for general application, it turned out that some of the tests does not have adequate security. There were even accusations that could influence the results. How do you respond to these accusations?
Of course, I understand resentment of people who report such reservations. It probably stems from the fact that they failed to overcome the threshold required to proceed to the second stage of the competition. However, absolutely can not agree with those allegations. Margaret Manowska, director of the National School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution source: Dziennik Gazeta Prawna Why? But the lack of seals is irrefutable fact.
To answer this question in detail should be provided, how the whole procedure from the moment of creation of tests until they hand test takers. Well, on this first stage of the work team appointed by the minister of justice. Its members meet in the room NSJPP, which is checked for wiretaps, you can not bring cell phones there. When the test is already written, it transmits the chairman of the laptop, which worked on the band, and the USB flash drive to the Director of the school. Everything is enclosed in protective envelopes.
Minutes shall be, then I, as the director of the school, I’m going with it to Warsaw, materials convey to Vice Minister of Justice, who oversees NSJPP. Deputy Minister acknowledge receipt, check whether the envelopes were not affected. Then they put them in a secret office in the Ministry of Justice, where the tests waiting to be printed. What entity is responsible for the printing of the test? Polish Security Printing Works. Its representatives meet in the ministry with the school principal, who in the presence of an employee of the department supervising departmental school shall provide them with a protocol envelope. PWPW prints tests, which are then secured three times.
The first protection is a band that prevents paging through the test. Then tests are packaged 10 pieces in a secure envelope that can not be opened without symptoms. And this is not the end. Later, because those envelopes are packed three in another collective safe envelope. And so it is imported by PWPW under escort on the day of the competition for the place where he is to take place. There receives these documents chairman of the examination committee and puts them in such a way that all the time examinee can see them. Later commission, with the participation of randomly selected candidates, there are security checks.
And only after the tests are dealt. Does this mean that in your opinion the National School does not accept any responsibility for what happened? Of course. We, after all these safeguards do not. We chose a trusted entity responsible for it.
So it PWPW is guilty? Label has already been called upon to pay a penalty. What were we talking about? As for the amount equal to approximately one-fourth of the total order value. The issue of lack of accountability on the side NSJPP is one thing, and the second is the effects of deficiencies, we have experienced during this year’s competition.
How do we know that the lack of seals on the tests did not affect the outcome? This type of security is only prevent the examinee thumb through a test before the start of the competition. The idea is that each of the candidates have the same time to complete the test. Commission before the start of the examination realized that something is wrong and those few tests were taken without the armband. We had prepared additional tests already fully and properly protected, they were distributed to test takers.
And the whole “affair” .Czy you agree with another allegation that the test was too difficult? As for the difficulty of the test is to be emphasized that the test is groomed by an independent team which is appointed by the Minister of Justice and the National School had no influence on what will be his level. So on this aspect of the attacks directed against the competition of the National School they are absolutely unfounded. But I am sure that no such vote will not lead in the future to reduce the level of difficulty of the test. It has no chance.
And this is because both the Minister of Justice, and the National School depends on the fact that the school is really getting the best candidates. It is yet to be future judges and prosecutors. This test may not be so easy. This year, 218 people managed to pass this test. And this is proof that the test can prepare and pass it. So in general everything it is just fine and there is no chance of any changes with regard to the form and manner of the test?
I did not say that. And I have to admit that I see some deficiencies in the currently applicable laws governing the conduct of the competition, which we are bound. It also recognizes the justice minister, who is the greatest transparency of access to school, and therefore for the most simple and transparent procedure for holding the contest. And so I think that in the near future, these legislative deficiencies will be removed. The shortcomings of which we speak? One of them is that we now test four variants of answers. It’s very difficult to build this test.
I say this as a long-term practice. I am the co-author of tests on enterprise applications (lawyer and legal adviser). Does this mean that in the future variants of answers will be less than it is now? In my opinion, the obligation to create a test, in which we have as many as four variants of answers, extremely increases the difficulty of the exam. However, I do not know in which direction they will go to change – it knows only the Minister of Justice. What kind of modifications is still a chance?
At this time limit of points needed to progress to the second stage of the competition establishes justice minister. So dictate his rules. It is a matter of discretionary and unpredictable. It should be changed. In addition, the competition is held in one place and in front of one examination board, which is assisted by teams appointed by the Minister of Justice.
In theory, the rules allow you to carry out the first stage of the competition at the premises of the courts of appeal and regional prosecutors’ offices. However, this would introduce a mess and the threat of access to testing by unauthorized persons. This solution would also be contrary to other specific provisions. Let me give an example: Regulation of the Minister of Justice requires that the tests were communicated to the teams no earlier than two hours before the start of the competition. How to achieve this goal, the chairman of the trustee egzaminacyjnej- envelopes with tests located in Warsaw, and individual teams in Szczecin, Wrocław, etc.
Such absurdities is more, which reported to the Minister of Justice. I am confident that the right decisions will be taken. Exams are not the only aspect for which recently attacked the National School. In the public debate are raised, for example. Arguments that it educates only theoretically, that puts graduates completely unfamiliar with the work of the courts and prosecutor’s offices. The National School prevail, but the positive reviews.
Presidents of seeking outright about our applicants, trying to make it in their courts they practice takes place. This is the best proof of the quality of education at the National School. On the other hand, the judge delegated to schools by the next term of office will lead the European Network of Judicial Training (EJTN). It is also a proof of confidence for the National School. Although there are also criticisms.
Some of them, formulated recently in the press I read with some embarrassment. Because they flow from the people who are in the criminal justice system and who formulate some theses about the school, indicating that they apparently did not read the law on the National School. Why do you think? They say that was better long application, when the applicant was at all times and was a patron of such training on the basis of the master – disciple. Indicate that thanks to close contact with the applicant patron able to assess his attitude, character traits. Meanwhile, now it is so!
After applicants are in the National School only five days a month, and the remaining time are at their patrons (in courts or prosecution offices), who evaluate their attitude and character traits.